Evaluation Report for General Writing Task 2 Discussion Essay Submission

Supporters of animal testing argue that it is pivotal for advancing human health. They assert that countless medical breakthroughs, such as vaccines and treatments for diseases, owe their success to animal experiments. For example, the use of mice in cancer research has allowed scientists to understand the disease better, leading to the development of lifesaving therapies. Advocates maintain that, currently, some complex living systems cannot be reliably replicated in vitro or through computer models, making the use of live animals indispensable.

Conversely, the opposition to animal testing hinges on ethical considerations. They argue that animals are sentient beings and should not be subjected to pain and distress for the sake of human benefit. Alternatives like organ-on-a-chip technology and computer modeling have been advanced, not only for their cruelty-free nature but also for potentially offering more accurate predictions of human responses. Furthermore, they point to the pressing issue of species differences, which sometimes renders animal experiments an unreliable indicator of human outcomes.

In summary, while animal testing has undoubtedly contributed to medical advancements in the past, the ethical implications and the availability of emerging alternatives cannot be overlooked. My stance is that research should vigorously pursue these alternatives to avoid animal suffering,