In your opinion, should entertainment programs be subject to stricter age ratings to prevent inappropriate content from reaching young audiences? Justify your stance.

It is undeniable that the media, particularly entertainment programs, play a significant role in shaping the minds of young viewers. Some argue that stricter age ratings should be imposed to shield the youth from unsuitable content. I am in strong agreement with this viewpoint for a couple of reasons. Firstly, children and teenagers are impressionable and often lack the maturity to differentiate between right and wrong. Exposure to violent or explicit content can desensitize them, leading to aggressive behavior or distorted perceptions of reality. For instance, studies have shown a correlation between violent video games and increased aggression in children. Therefore, stricter age ratings can act as a preventive measure, ensuring that only age-appropriate content reaches them. Secondly, stricter age ratings can help parents monitor and control what their children watch. In today's digital age, children have easy access to a plethora of content, making parental supervision challenging. Age ratings can serve as a guide for parents, enabling them to make informed decisions about what is suitable for their children to watch. However, it is important to note that age ratings alone cannot fully protect young viewers. They should be complemented with parental guidance and education about media literacy. Children should be taught to critically analyze what they watch and understand the difference between media portrayals and real life. In conclusion, while stricter age ratings for entertainment programs are necessary to prevent inappropriate content from reaching young audiences, they are not a standalone solution. They should be part of a broader strategy that includes parental involvement and media literacy education to ensure the healthy mental and emotional development of children.