Some people think the government should support artists like painters, musicians, and poets, while others believe this wastes money. Discuss both views and give your ownopinion.

Individually, every profession plays its role in any culture or society, irrespective of the number of people who are involved in specific profession or amount of money that is required for its preservation for coming generations. It is often debated that the non scientific professions such as painting, music and poetry, should be funded by offical government of a country. Meanwhile, many people support the idea that large sum of money should not be wasted on these careers, as there many other problems are waiting to tackle. This essay will explore both of these paradigms and will provide conclusion with logical statement. It is undeniable factor that artists are the assests of a country as they represent cultural and religious values globally by their art of music, painting or poetry. These professions have no boundries and artist should be promoted by the help of government funding as most of them live a life like a unknown person and mostly their work get recognized later after their death. Everyone has different nature and their ability to appreciate the gems of art, music and poetry differs in person to person. Therefore, government should allocat special funding for their assistance to promote their skills. Internation seminars and campaigns should be arranged for their recognization globally. We can take an example of South Korea, where people are keen to preserve their culture by participating in these professions and they have successfully achieved their target by gaining fame worldwide, as we all know about BTS band, that is extremely famous all over the world although they use their own language and cultural values in their music. All this happens due to support of government and now they are getting huge revenues by their concerts and music. Thus, supporting artist are essential for a country to move ahead in this pace of technology and economic war. While on the other hand, some people argue that there are other pressing issue present, which are in dire need of attention and funding by government and spending resources on artist will be wastage of money. Health and education sectors are the backbone of very every country. If poeple are not in good health, and illiteracy rate is getting higher every year, than it can be considered that spending money on artist can be wastage. Therefore, goverment should support the artist, when other issues are being resolved easily. For instance, in North Korea, 87% of people are illiterate and they do not have access to basic health facilities, but their government have allocated about 3 billion dollar soley for the promotion of artist across the globe, just to beat with their neighbour country. This is unfair with the people and coming generations. Thus, funding of artist can be wastage of money too. However, I believe that government can support the artist as well as other facilities by creating a certain balance. It should be depended on the condition and circumstances of economy of a country, to which extent they can support and assist the artist without wasting money. In conclusion, some poeple supports the idea of allocating of funding for artists by government, whereas some poeple think opposite of it and consider it a wasting money. But I believe that by defining a regulatory framework according to economic stituation of a country, we can save cultural values by music, art and poetry and funding can be recoverd by generating revenues through these professions.