Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the increasing reliance on technology is making people less capable of solving problems without digital assistance?

The debate surrounding technology's impact on our problem-solving skills is quite pertinent. I believe that the increasing use of technology has indeed made us somewhat reliant on digital tools for problem-solving tasks. The primary argument for my stance is that technology serves as a crutch for many, thus hindering the development of critical thinking. With the advent of search engines and apps for nearly every conceivable task, the need to figure things out independently seems to have waned. For instance, a student who relies on calculators for basic arithmetic may struggle to perform such operations without the device, indicating a diminished capacity to solve problems unaided. Furthermore, the immediacy and array of solutions technology offers can stifle creativity. People often resort to the first solution offered by a digital assistant without exploring alternative or innovative approaches. To illustrate, instead of brainstorming and developing unique ideas, many turn to idea-generating software, potentially curtailing their creative faculties. However, it's important to acknowledge that technology also presents resources that can foster problem-solving skills when used appropriately. The key is a balanced approach; leveraging technology for learning and efficiency, while ensuring analog methods and independent thinking remain integral to one's skill set. In conclusion, the overuse of technology can indeed make individuals less adept at solving problems independently. To counteract this, we should encourage a more harmonious relationship with our digital tools, using them as aids, not substitutes, in the problem-solving process.